Wednesday, 1 May 2019

‘Passion is a part of the trip, compassion its destiny’: A Conversation with Margarita R. Merino - Re-Markings March 2019


‘Passion is a part of the trip, compassion its destiny’: 
A Conversation with Margarita R. Merino 
Nibir K. Ghosh
Dr. Margarita Merino de LIndsay has worked in education, graphic design, the media and has had expositions of her poems and drawings.  She has published books such Viaje al inte­rior, Baladas del abismo, Halcón herido, Demonio contra arcángel, La dama della gallerna, Viaje al exterior, Pregón de un Sábado de Piñata and many essays, articles, columns and short stories.  Critics highlight her talent as “total poetry” through the vitality of her voice.  In Mudrovic’s Mirror, Mirror on the Page: Identity and Subjectivity on Spanish Women´s Poetry (1975-2000) she was identified as perhaps the one “who avails herself of the poem as a mirror with the most variety and imagination.” She has lectured, given recitals and sung in prairies, prisons, theaters, classrooms, night-clubs, cloisters and castles. Born in Spain, she lives in USA.

NKG: What attracted you initially to art and poetry? When did you publish your first poem?
MM: Love of arts runs in my blood. I have been communicating with myself—writing, drawing, and singing inside too—since my very early childhood, many times while hiding in closets. Some external sources were helpful such as the good library we had at home–books have been always there and I have been a voracious self-taught reader-. The strict environment where spontaneity or free thinking was repressed with fear at school, the punishment for “disobeying” or being different, the constriction to express ideas, imagination, around the whole society—especially for girls (women were second or third class citizens always under the control of fathers, brothers, husbands, sons…, in the Franquism)—triggered for me the wish to survive those boundaries in a quiet, secret form.  I ‘published’ some of my early poems and handmade images in school magazines that have been lost with time or otherwise vanished.  I had boxes of drawings, poems, illustrated things, but in the frustrated ways of overwhelmed women mostly doing home chores, my mother or a maid stored those early creations in an outdoor balcony, under the rain and the snow…. So the elements destroyed them.
NKG: Who were the people you would like to single out as your source(s) of inspiration?  
MM: My father (Bonifacio Merino) was a very inspiring human being, a great person always helping and listening to others. He was sensitive for culture too—he loved literature, art, music, poetry. Poets such as Bécquer, Rosalía de Castro, Antonio Machado, Lorca; musicians such as Beethoven, Falla, Albéniz; many artists from western culture and cultures around the world were present in the very early years of my childhood but the biggest influence was the care my father had for his family and friends, his dream of universal understanding among people.
NKG: You received a Coca-Cola Composition National Award when you were just thirteen. What was your composition about? What are your impressions of visiting Italy as part of receiving the award?
MM: The subject to write about was given to us: “La rueda”: “The Wheel.”  I wanted to finish it fast to attend a birthday party, so I was a bit lazy. I wrote about the history of a wheel that was first used to carry a fancy carriage in a beautiful city—it was probably the 19th Century—to pass later on to be engaged in rural work; to be used after that in serving the adventurous life of some gypsies, and finally abandoned in a forest where—because its first transformation for humans its destiny was to be an useful utensil for them—it misses the joy to serve and remembers the voices of young kids … with tears … in an early use of ‘personification.’
Being a daughter of Gothic Cathedrals, sober abbeys; a neighbor of the ancient culture of Rome in many ways,—an ‘apprentice’ of that old style lawyer my father was—we celebrated every day the antique Roman laws, Roman civil architecture such as aqueducts, roads ‘calzadas’, obelisks…. To be somehow ‘citizens of the Roman Empire’ and its civilized lands was our pride. It is fair to remember the roots of first ancestors but we should also be conscious of their side of barbarity too … ‘Astures’ who rode Asturcones horses almost naked and whose women gave birth by themselves standing up in the fields, but whose enemies were precipitated to the abysms from the top of mountains—as the Spartans did against the customs of Athenians.
I loved deeply my trip to Italy! Italy, its magnificent creations, enchanted me in full—its  culture, impressive art, fashion, music, taste and design, delicious food, welcoming people everywhere.  I should have stayed hidden there and never returned back to Spain.
NKG: Would you like to talk about the flooding of your Spanish library? How did it happen?
MM: I was living with my young daughter in a cute sunny apartment—kind of a tiny, modest penthouse with a big terrace—in León, Spain. I had a small but pretty diverse library whose books—collected with care—were put in boxes and left in a subterranean garage with a ramp down under the house of some friends when—it was the year 1992—we moved to the States. I rented my apartment with everything but our personal belongings, books, long plays.  It was one of the worst floods that ever took place—when heavy rains happened in the north the same year, it flooded that garage and destroyed all my books, drawings, pictures, photos (mine and those of my daughter), wonderful letters from people who are gone. Still I dream of those books and go to the shelves in my dreams to open their pages. I have written poems about that … I go with closed eyes to pages of unique collections of children books bought for me by my parents, pages of my favorite poems, pages with quotations, pages of antique books, pages where special friends and writers wrote dedications many years ago.
NKG: As a student of Political Science and Sociology, what are your impressions about life and polity in Spain? 
MM: I knew already that Spain was detained in its right to develop as other neighboring European countries evolved. It happened because of our undeniable peculiar history the Franquism and the long dictatorship damned deeper. But even before it was already a country full of dysfunctional manners—a disability for the ones in charge to reach for the benefit of all the members of society—although the splendid figures, artists, compassionate thinkers that Spain had (we were the first ones to defend human beings against slavery through our notion of “Leyenda negra”—“Black Legend”—invented by our rivals in the times when Spain was in power over seas and lands...).  It is often forgotten that almost all of our neighbors had Inquisitions as well during the dark centuries, that we are also our most acute critics in advertising our shortcomings. Spain, despite its rare, precious ‘vidriera’`— ‘stained glass window’—has had three cultures (Christian, Muslim, Jewish) living together; it has a twisted history since the Middle Ages. It is a complex, manipulated interpretation when the historical truth has been carefully disguised in the benefit of the Castilian “ID”—but, please do not understand I am supporting any new nationalism when these are the causes of racism and bloody rampages. Among its marvels, Spain has a disturbing history of wars, destruction, intolerance, extreme poverty of the peasants. The communal lands of the towns (we have had too very advanced democratic communal laws before the British had them)—were sold by absurd legislation across centuries. A lack of understanding of the biggest Spanish burdens and problems (injustice, poverty, illiteracy, fanatism) added to a lack of insight from governments—private or public counselors, religious figures attached to the royals—‘validos’, inefficient politicians, greedy or lazy aristocrats, dismantled the puzzle to ashes. Our Golden Century in Literature and Arts has behind it a scenery that was not so bright. Added to it was a wide possibility of corruption in each corner where escaping every law was available to powerful people or to the ones in charge; authoritarism, selfishness from our uneducated disconnected rich classes—lacking in compassion or the minimal sense of social justice; a Catholic church becoming more conservative and their docile servant when it became impoverished itself by the loss of its own properties and ways to stay independent, able to help the ones in need, when the terrifying big lost— “desamortizaciones” happened. What country has destroyed the irrecoverable wonders of all its amazing monasteries as Spain did with its own?  The poor raising explosive resentment and rage built for the long forgetfulness which made them to die of starvation, kept them totally illiterate and without any possibility to work for sustaining themselves, the glorification of a horrifying ‘picaresque’: that celebrated wish to be successfully dishonest! An historical absence of respect for others, a renewed rejection to open, practical ideas happening in our vicinity, and the lack of understanding of the big picture for the country by some outstanding ethical individuals—who were highly spirited and wanted to help Spain—but who did not evaluate properly the real dynamics. Low classes always were manipulated by the feudal landlords—minifundio or latifundio, the ‘caciques’ had a crucial role in Spanish misery—, and the lack of interest or the ability of our political groups to work together. We had learned nothing from Don Quixote.
NKG: Did the Spanish Civil War bring any changes to the situation you describe?
MM: The Civil War of 1936, after the Alzamiento—uprising—of July 18th of the fascists and the conservative forces against the II República, destroyed the biggest efforts in our history to extend public education everywhere, its redefined teachers—‘los maestros de la República’—forged in the ethical foundation of “La Institución Libre de Enseñanza” which goals had their roots in the Krausism. Unfortunately, the Republic was stained by bloody forces wherein actions came from violent groups from both sides involved in horrible crimes: that repulsive execution was claimed out loud by some leaders. I recommend the classic The Spanish Labyrinth by Gerald Brenan, aka “don Geraldo” an Englishman who lived many years close to Granada who truly loved Spain.

NKG: In the words of Eric Hobsbawm, “The Spanish Civil War united a generation of young writers, poets and artists in political fervor. The wrong side may have won, but in creating the world's memory of the conflict, the pen, the brush and the camera have had the more lasting triumph.” How would you react to the statement as a Spanish national?

MM: Yes, it is right. To feel the “Spanish Passion”—its lust and belief—meant to endure its rigors for many young artists and journalists (see the books by ‘hispanistas’ as Paul Preston and Hugh Thomas) who died—war photographers many of them—because of it, or who wrote of it and whose lives were changed for ever by the brutal events they witnessed there, —some were imprisoned as Koestler; some friendships were broken too (as the Hemingway-Dos Passos issue caused by the tragic death of José Robles Pazos), —it was logical and almost contagious. Some came in their own planes as Antoine de Saint-Exupéry. In part, the “romanticized” aspect of the war spread with an impressive imaginary, moving propaganda; the exotism exuded from an attractive, a still undeveloped country in a conflict referred with a blooming media coverage, the compulsion to be there … and the parallel hours of celebration and companionship with other colleagues for a few as Hemingway. For some of the foreign young writers and journalists, it was easy to get involved. While some of the ‘privileged’ participants or observers did not experience in their hotels the lack of food or basic comfort that most of the inhabitants in Spain were suffering all the time, some were soon disappointed about the situation and left Spain (as Orwell) or stayed since the leitmotif in Madrid for most in the resistance was “No pasarán.” For too many readers that Spanish subject passed too soon in its cultural fashion, so the Spanish Civil War remained forgotten by most liberal or democratic politicians who could have had made the Franquism not so at ease. The same liberals who finished trading with the rebels and the dictator because of the help to the rebels from the Nazi German military trying its weapons, the Fascist Italian support, or the intimidating Moor fighters and the cruel legionarios that Franco brought, the war for the Republic with its no professional soldiers, frail volunteers, poorly trained and fed, was already lost. The Spanish president of government Azaña was naïve when he could have been in control and punished the commanding military men in conspiracy. The Franquism stayed 40 years for the Spaniards until Spain was unable to be recognized anymore.  The International Brigades brought people who suffered fighting with the Spaniards in the front defending the República Española. Reading memories of those who lived the ominous events makes me very sad, also grateful for their huge sacrifice in leaving their lives behind to defend ideals, to die unknown.

NKG: Writers and poets like Federico García Lorca, George Orwell, Arthur Koestler, Andre Malraux, W.H. Auden, John Dos Passos, Ernest Hemingway, Emma Goldman, Pablo Neruda and many others glorified the spirit of the Republican cause not only through their creative works but also in actually participating in the war. Any favorites among these?
MM: I read almost all of them and their work many years ago. My underlined books disappeared in the 1992 flooding of my library. I never tried to replace them, and in fact I have been afraid to return to some of those readings. These years I read more about the war history, memories or biographies. I often still find myself crying through many nights of insomnia because of those events. Among my favorite writers always are the poet Antonio Machado whose great poetry paralleled his ethics as a human being and who shared with the losers their painful destiny, being consistent with his ideals until the very end of his path; Federico García Lorca, who suffered vicious jealousy against his success, was assassinated in his Granada by the orders of the general Queipo de Llano (Ian Gibson has written a lot about Lorca); the very fine, who suffered real starvation, Peruvian poet César Vallejo whose poetry book “España, aparta de mí este cáliz” is one of the most emotional works written about the Spanish tragedy. Pablo Neruda, despite his great poems and fame—or maybe for this—was not always the best as a human being, he was—as many poets are—overly egotistic; though having all the commodities, recognition and possibilities to help Vallejo, he was afraid of the deep poetry written by the Peruvian poet and never helped him. I must remember the peasant poet Miguel Hernández who died as prisoner of the Franquists, as in some way the old and repented don Miguel de Unamuno did. Hemmingway is special for me for his Spanish passion. His many contradictions make him very interesting and human: when my husband and I visited his home at Key West in Florida I still felt his presence. An informative book more unknown than the mediocre—with some very beautiful pages—La arboleda perdida by Rafael Alberti is the one written by his wife María Teresa León Memoria de la melancolía. It is hard to read their praising of the Stalin (whose brutal methods added more blood to the war) figure they meet visiting Russia or their political preferences—ideology many times makes blind the ones who take partisan sides. But they both played a positive role in the educational “Las misiones pedagógicas”—as Federico did it in “La Barraca”—and still Alberti and León, helped bravely to save the treasures of The Prado Museum traveling in risky trips in trucks driven by the milicianos under the Fascist bombings. Something fun and kind of hilarious is to think in the frail and short-sighted Simone Weil trying to shoot in the anarchist column of Buenaventura Durruti.
NKG:  The Spanish Civil War is said to be the dress rehearsal for the Second World War. How would you respond to this statement? What memories of the Spanish Civil War did you receive from your mother, María Estrella Sánchez Corbelle?
MM: It is true. That rehearsal was the main reason the war was lost by the legitimate government of the Republic that never received help from France or England. In addition to the treason made by many of the Generals of the Spanish military to the República, Nazi Germany tried their super-sophisticated weapons, their invincible combat planes in Spain. It was a butchery. My mother, María Estrella Sánchez Corbelle, was very disturbed in the depth of her soul, had ciclotimias, fear, melancholic moods triggered by the horrible events she witnessed in her youth in La Coruña. I have published few moths ago a little book—Pregón de Sábado de Piñata (con explicación y gata) —where the poem “Estrangulada su juventud por la guerra fratricida”–“Her Youth Suffocated by the Fratricide War—refers how she watched, as other civilians did, the corpses of fathers and little young sons assassinated by the Falangistas: corpses showing in their poor mortal remains the “tiro de gracia”—the signature last shot from the fascist in their forehead. Those corpses were often dropped in the ditches off the roads.  She told me about it all the time. I was very depressed.
If someone wants to know the irrational, abominable ways of the repression suffered by average Spaniards one may take a look at Muerte en Zamora by Ramón Sender Barayón. A true history where abandonment, abuse from greedy relatives or an acquaintance rejected by the victim such as a boyfriend, added torture, and execution of an innocent woman: the mother of the author. Spain was scary in those years, and the many of the ones who claimed to have God on their side committed the biggest atrocities.
NKG: As a poet-painter, what are your impressions of Pablo Picasso’s ‘Guernica’?
MM: I would like to deserve one day to have the title of a painter but I am far from it due to my busy daily life. About the ambiguous ‘Guernica’—an emblematic painting critically analyzed again and again, acclaimed as a symbol against the brutality of war for many of its experts, is it truly a representation of the bombing that happened in Guernica April 28th of 1936 by the German ‘Legión Cóndor’?  Is it a masterpiece related with the unknown thoughts of Picasso or a spiral of answers to the dramatic forces and art movements (as the Surrealism) that were taking place in those years of world unrest?  I must simply refer to the words, translating them, spoken by Juan Larrea (who seemed to have had an important part in the role the painting played): “throwing down the historical truth, the basic mystery which makes art emotional just happens.”
NKG: How would you describe your experience of moving from a nation steeped in history and culture to the land that Columbus discovered by default only a few centuries ago?
MM: I always have loved the Americas.  The speaking Spanish America, the North America which diversity makes together with Canada a vigorous continent. I had a romantic idea through art, literature, music, cinema about America. When I came—knowing no English at all (I used to speak French, now totally “slept” same as other old languages as Latin and old Greek I could traslate in my childhood I have totally forgotten)—I was in shock.  I had an anagnorisis on the fortunate life I have had in Spain—notwithstanding the restrictions—simply by being a member of an educated family. Many of the simple daily ways in Spain seemed suddenly big luxuries here—the little things and details which enrich our existence, as I am sure you have plenty of them in India—in comparison with the rush, the workaholism and busy lives here, the isolation, the materialism, the obsession for religion but with such an absence of spirituality in the USA. At the same time, I have admired the many possibilities that are offered around and the essential freedom to choose. I am grateful too for the American friends I have.
NKG: Did you have to undergo assimilation in the melting pot metaphor that characterizes the U.S.A.?
MM: Of course my Spanish ways created for me a lot of misunder-standings. Generosity was suspicious! The revival of a kind of intolerance for being different—here or there—made me to restrain myself as a loner again, I assume life is not pleasant when seen as constant competition, but it is a fact I feel well enough now, and some similarities—as my Cuban-American friend Gustavo Pérez Firmat would say—with the ones living “in the hyphen.” I am, and I write, in a territory that is not León, Florida or Tennessee, a place that is neither Spain nor the States.
NKG: What is your perception of the ‘American Dream’?
MM: My perception is related to that dream by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. or the ones that John F. Kennedy or his brother Robert Kennedy would have tried to reach if they would have been not assassinated.  But the American Dream now is lost in many ways right now.
NKG: Who are the poets whom you consider as influences on your growth as a poet?
MM: I have many debts sustaining the wish to write or being encouraged to continue alive rather than to a particular style. To feel in company and dialogue with some dead writers when more functional illiteracy is spread around. The more my life passes, the more that I read, the more unfair it seems to me to quote a few of the writers among the many I have read, loved, liked and learned from. I do not like to simplify years of reading and exploring universes in different vital moments and from diverse epochs, ways, and languages. Spanish, Roman, Greek or French, Italian or Portuguese, German or Russian, British, Irish or American writers. Or, if I tried to remember I would think in poems, novels, short stories, chapters more than in particular poets, novelists or writers. I suppose ancient mythology, Homer or Virgil, had a big impact in my early days. Still I remember a children’s book, Platero y yo, when I love animals so much, its sad ending. Many of my inspiring poets or writers were those who in fact had not much recognition along their lives.
NKG: What aspects of American life, literature and culture impresses you most?
MM: America is a very big, alive, diverse place no matter how the ultraconservative forces try to confuse, pervert or diminish its genuine spirit.  America is a great country. The variety of American spectrum, freedom, the self-criticism many of its creators have about their own culture or surroundings. It is easy to remember some of the names who have illuminated my Spanish nights: Edgar Allan Poe, William Faulkner, Mark Twain, Walt Whitman, Lovecraft, Ernest Hemingway, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Emily Dickinson, Isaac Asimov, John Steinbeck … and, and, and …  I was forgetting one of my very favorite writers: Jack London!  I will not be able to quote so many of the American films that I love, so many songs I like.

NKG: Would you agree to P.B. Shelley’s observation, “Most wretched men/ Are cradled into poetry by wrong:/ They learn in suffering what they teach in song”?

MM: Yes. It was a bright way to explain what I call ‘vital alchemy.’  As the dark late Spanish baroque shows light and shadow rule together the human soul, the best poetry in its depth does not come as easy.  Pain, rejection, failures widen our insight, make us become humble, able to better understand. P.B. Shelley is now beloved but he was not so acclaimed by his contemporaries.  I think passion is a part of the trip, but compassion is its destiny.

NKG: You have been graciously eloquent in speaking about A World Assembly of Poets and the inclusion of your poem “Ballad Beyond the Darkness.” How does it feel to find your connection with India through this Re-Markings’ Special number?
MM: Magical. I was just blessed by a mysterious Indian spell which put me in the stanzas of a colorful, vivid piece of poetry as art—A World Assembly of Poets—which is going to last. You, Nibir, were the wizard. India was in my early years in some the poems of Rabindranath Tagore translated by Juan Ramón Jiménez and Zenobia Camprubí as it has been always in the admiration I feel for Mahatma Gandhi, or showed up again in The God of Small Things.
NKG: It is believed, good poetry is lost in translation. What is your view? Do you feel more comfortable writing in Spanish and then translating it into English or you prefer to write in Spanish and allow others to do the translation?
MM: Because I did not have a formal education in English and I learned it by osmosis, always I am at a disadvantage.  There is no comparison with the use of my Spanish language. I write in Spanish mostly but sometimes I do in English—how have I the bravery?  I can not avoid it. The process of the translation to English by others can be painful and risky—although I am grateful some poems have been translated—too many subtle things change there.
NKG: Your poem, “Ballad Beyond the Darkness” ends thus: “She loves you so/ darling old lost world/ coasts and plains and mountains of Spain/ Oh Sweet Tennessee.” Can we call this “mixing memory and desire” in terms of your nostalgia for the past and attraction to the present?
MM: You explained it perfectly!  I am grateful to both worlds, their creatures, their nature.
NKG: Going by the contents and expression in your poems entitled, “Mi casa,” “Black Birds at the Windows,” “Ballad Beyond the Darkness,” “Tunnel Infinito” and “Flying in Tierrasola,” would you accept that the images in the poems reveal your affinity to magic realism?
MM: Again, you nailed it, Nibir. Magical realism has been present in my unconscious life since its origins because it was a substantial part of the memory of my parents, part of the way they spoke, related with stories happening in their families and lives, as the legends of their geographical areas and traditions encouraged.  Now you can read the poem “Black Birds at the Windows” and decide if you prefer it to my long answers, or maybe to cut some of them and publish both in your tested generosity.  Many thanks for all the convergences you bring through diversity and my congratulations too.
NKG: Thanks Margarita for making this a wonderful conversation. In deference to your express wish, we are rounding off this exchange with what you consider your most loved poem, “Black Birds at the Windows.”

Black Birds at the Windows
Margarita Merino
Translated from the Spanish by Brenda Logan Cappuccio
To Edgar Allan Poe
In the ominous corridors of childhood
where we fearfully shivered and shuddered sheltered in closets
behind the overcoats and with mothballs on our breath,
in strict schools where we ate bloody liver
choking back our disgust as the monitors jotted down
the names of the disobedient on punishment lists,
there where we hid novels and poems, wondrous stories,
under the blue folds of our robes and our uniforms,
the adults tried to disguise the dizzying frenzy of time
degrading us with implacably ordered doll houses.
The domestic rituals of the pale-faced dolls reduced
to a world upholstered in cretonne were carried out correctly
under the scrutinizing eyes of the nosy neighbors of those galleries
with no front walls where perhaps mystery
had secretly nested in its chaotic order.
Play was a formal exercise in the parameters
where pulchritude could not take the place of emotion.
(Ah denial served up in steaming tureens,
the harshness of calendars wrapped in mufflers,
snow falling softly on your mouth burning your lips.)
Far from the cabins in the mountains that exuded
freedom in abundance, in the delirium of the fevers
of childhood, we dreamed of the Great North and a freezing wind
rocked us in its currents as far as the wolfhounds
and the infinite meadows.
The citizens of Foundation and Empire fed on
the sugary celluloid sweetness of the Disney factory
mixer of immortal stories in tasteless batter
to refine the movements of children born very old
to the taste of nuns, frigid mothers, notary confessors
who never filtered the transparency of the punishment
for difference.  And we lived it humiliated
on our knees, faces to the wall, with our arms
extended and books in our hands, anointed with white chalk
in the corners next to wastebaskets and blackboards,
filling up with rage, never ever saying the word sorry.
Some of us grew up different despite everyone,
dark circles under our eyes and fear in our fantasies, knowing we were
guilty, exiled forever from the gentle
normalcy that other kids enjoyed in their homes,
and the staircase landings with their scent of wax-comforting
to them-seemed to us threatening places
where you could feel the still fresh throbbing trace
of horrendous crimes between the stairs of each floor
and the vestibule.  The fear of being defenseless in the face of cruelty
would take us by surprise: suddenly pressure in the stomach,
the death rattles of the repressed archways in the dining rooms
of the school, the involuntary vomiting that nobody consoled,
the growing omen of that unknown sickness
where the stumps of your soul ache.
Precocious readers, runaway sleepwalkers
who dreamed up other spaces from the alphabet,
we knew early the salty flavor of the fiercest
romanticism in the substance of our tears
but not even the fear of contrite reprisals
could cure us of the stigma and halo of the star:
the rebelliousness of escaping to little prisons
galloped like a wild pony transcending the boundaries
of a prefabricated universe made of papier-mâché
and the tightness of the lie didn’t trap the integrity
of our thoughts, agile like eagles,
when they finally assumed their uniqueness.
Stubbornly, travelers toward the cupolas of the cosmos,
persistent in the imagination that freed us
from the daily abyss where happiness was routinely asphyxiated,
we would fly as the intrepid pilots of so many illusions,
navigators of dreams conceived in terrible gargoyles
in Gothic cathedrals that darkened their stained glass windows
with the secret of underground passages.  We were
quiet adventurers into the intuition of the parallel reign
and we crossed over into the country from which there is no return
without staining ourselves with mud, sweat or blood.
Suckled in a voracious melancholy
that was not reflected in mirrors we were
more alone day by day surprised at dawn
in a monologue of strawberries, chocolate and pages.
Those weren’t times to celebrate the collective memory
in the perception of prohibited identity with a song
of one’s self, and on winter’s horizons
the domes of a temple of mercy never appeared:
we knew that our pilgrimage would never lead us
to contemplate the late afternoon from the tranquility of our patios,
and that we would never find the marvelous imaginary city.
But it was impossible to resist this foolish inclination to imagine
movements and magic forms in hallways and corners,
balconies, laboratories and storage rooms, the message of the sermon
crouched among the school desks, prosaic logic of the poor human
eagerness arranged according to the ashen measure of the [confessionals:
passions were rigid, deformed, like the sad fetuses
in the vials of formaldehyde and the withered remains of the [dissecttions
silhouetted on paper like the paper doll cut-outs of the model
that the intolerant middle class of the provinces propagated
and their hunger for a never-golden prosperity.
Then we accepted with pride the smoke signals
that our dreaming inspired where we lived split
into other happier selves, the shining brothers of unnameable [shadows,
knowing in our hearts that we were artists amid incomprehension.
Shocked, we sensed the nearness of the presence,
the foreboding flapping of the carnivorous birds
that tore away all certainty from the thresholds,
and their call made us abandon the warmth of the sheets
recognizing our status as chosen ones, the curiosity
which reveals premonitions.  And we learned
to listen to the lament of the dying impaled
on walls, the mewing of ghostly cats, the pain
of the betrayed, the callousness of murderers
expectantly awaiting their chance too
in the tranquility of libraries and family parlors
sowing a mute terror in throats
which have begun to forget children’s songs.
Thus we kept losing our way on the course of our youth,
the trip we would never undertake to sweet paradises
ignored because of the conflict between the concealed and the visible,
confirming in our gut that the eradication of desire,
fear, was a form of cancer that was devastatingly rotting
the delicate epithelia of primordial illusion,
and we obeyed by locking life up in the attic.
The funereal hours passed on a watch without hands
at the initiation to a mystery that gave us another homeland.
Curled up in our favorite hiding places, stretched out under
the chestnut trees and lilac bushes of the Garden of the Assumption
or kneeling on the benches of the school chapel adorned in its finery,
breathing the dense perfume of incense and fresh flowers,
between the sing-song of the prayers and the sacred chants
we were guests of the sinister rooms:
engrossed, we read the dark stories nestled in the bosom
of the missals and their spotless, mother-of-pearl covers
anxiously invoking their creators and creatures,
immersed in the wide space of adventure only
to evade the urgent beauty of the psalms
and the sadness of love-with-a-capital-letter fiercely denied.
A solitary man, in the bitterness of his wretched days,
had opened the cages of the impossibility we knew so well.
Many ominous birds disseminated the desolation of his talent,
the torment of nightmares where alcohol oozed
grimaces and shrouds, yellowish liquid masks
of the most profound pain, larvae of ravenous grief
in the interstices of those left to their own devices,
and one night a heavenly ambassador from the forbidden spheres,
the raven, was awaiting me in my father’s study
bringing signs of the future.
“I am,” he said, “your guardian angel.  I have come
to save you from the hope you don’t have.”
“It’s nothing more than the winter gale, the wood contracting
because of the cold,” I assured myself, refusing to glance at the [shadow
projecting from the bust of Beethoven.  The storm
abated.  The reflection of the snow on the nearby flat roof
gleamed with an unreal brilliance freezing the instant
into a still life.  I couldn’t make a sound, and there was no threat
in the tone of that changeable voice that had a mocking
inflection-was it my own interior voice speaking aloud?-
but the crow laughed stridently with harsh cackles
and I fell into a leather chair, turning my back to the evidence,
my gaze floating out into the ghostly sky.
“I’m on the fourth floor of a building in a city
where nothing ever happens, it’s a hallucination caused by the moon and tides,
weariness because of too little sleep, the result of annoying
jokes by my older brothers, too much reading science
fiction and horror stories by flashlight . . .,” I told myself.
“Learn to listen to the language of nightwalking birds
and noble savages, the signs of a world made for you,”
recited the ugly bird in the manner of a Sunday sermon.
And I, astonished, thought: “I’m just a little girl in the middle
of a realistic and very strange dream; I’ll wake up soon.”
A leaden silence perched on my temples,
and I sensed the soft spreading of feathers, the voice now murmuring:
“Yes,”-the words are engraved in my memory as if on tombstones-
“you will awaken to solitude, your heart’s only sustenance,
and nothing more . . .”-There was an agonizing pause.-
“Nothing more than the landscape, the flow of nature
on nights like this one, knowledge, books . . . Nothing more.” 
Everything around me began to spin.  The outlines of objects
disappeared in the dizziness of my fall into the darkness
of a hazy dream.  Melodies and hymnals, windows,
the height of the mountains, thermometers, the sea and notebooks
merged.  The faces of my familiars grew old spookily
and my face was consumed in the stages of aging to senility. 
I witnessed the wound of time, the destruction of all
that I had loved, still loved, and would ever love.
Because my corpuscles were the inheritors of a never-ending weeping,
and I was the carrier of that weeping, and belonged forever
to generations of weeping, to the family of animals who weep,
and I would dream pointlessly in the country of weeping and of cold [bonfires.
All that remained were the tides, the cyclical lunar debit of their flow,
the fratricidal balance of the waves swinging the bodies of dolphins,
dirty boats in oceans corrupted by the waste of war,
anonymous corpses with their faces nibbled away by fish,
unanswered letter decayed by seaweed and by petroleum,
and on the muddy shores of oblivion, the hunger of the multitude.
Quieted after the mutilation of the watch towers, the storms left behind
a lament over losses, a burning infection from the past,
the agony of unfulfilled love and the burning fresh breeze
in memories, a malignant list of frugal length.
Eyes poisoned by mercury: insects exploring
rotten grasslands, gray lizards in the demolished rubble.
And finally, far from the perfection of the cloisters, McDonald.
In the ruins of the empty amphitheaters, black canvasses, caustic [soda.
Deciphering the message of time, its signs and its petals: the remains
of syringes of serum, the vision of guts invaded by absence,
pentothal in your bones, the scent of bleach in bedpans,
snakes in the cracks of solitary hospitals,
old age in the consumption of mercy.
But I learned to expect the arrival of the sinister birds
on nights of sleeplessness and sacrifice.
Thankfully I opened the windows when I heard in the eaves
the rhythmic beating of the impatient blackness
of their wings.
I was their hostess.  I served them honey and little soft rolls.
With them I inferred the certainty of the interpretation of omens.
I let them perch on the head of my bed in rooms
where they monitored the course of my thoughts,
my engrossed reading of the books I love.
With them I confronted my father’s death, the losses,
the lullabies sung to my only daughter to inform her
of the direction of the faraway kingdom.
And I tiptoe across the territories of twilight
until I recognize every inch of their quaking bogs without crying
now that I am getting old.
And I smile serenely, when everyone has gone, when everything is [turned off,
freed of the tremulous spells of happiness,
while they recite in a semi-darkness that for me will never exist “nevermore.”
Note: "Pájaros negros junto a los ventanales" ("Black Birds at The Windows") was first published in America and the Spanish-Speaking World, Part II. Ed. Ed Stanton. ANQ 10.3 (Summer 1997): 2-11.
·        Dr. Nibir K. Ghosh, former Head, Department of English Studies & Research, Agra College, Agra is UGC Professor Emeritus. He has been a Senior Fulbright Fellow at the University of Washington, Seattle, USA during 2003-04. An eminent scholar and critic of American, British and Postcolonial literatures, he is Author/Editor of 14 widely acclaimed books and has published over 170 articles and scholarly essays on various political, socio-cultural and feminist issues in prestigious national and international journals.
Published in Re-Markings Vol. 18 No.1 March 2019.  - www.re-markings.com

Copyright Nibir K. Ghosh 2019.
v

Remembering Swami Vivekananda on the 125th Anniversary of his Historic 1893 Chicago Address by Swami Sujayananda Re-Markings March 2019


Swami Sujayananda
When we remember a speech delivered by Swami Vivekananda at the World Parliament of Religions, Chicago, 125 years ago then we can safely assume that it must be very special and especially relevant even today. We will try to see what he spoke on that day and how it is relevant even in present times, what is its impact and effect in India and in the world in general and most importantly what tribulations and hardships he had to undergo before reaching the Parliament of Religions at Chicago and becoming the world famous Vivekananda.
Even today he is remembered for that famous speech delivered on 11th September, 1893. It

was not even a speech; it was an introductory address of barely four minutes which made history. The first day of the Parliament was devoted to twenty-four short replies by the delegates after the welcome address by the officials. Other delegates came prepared with their speeches and many read their addresses but the Swami had neither prepared nor brought any notes along with him. He was not even prepared to deliver his address before such a huge elite gathering as we come to know from one of his letters written after the Parliament to Shri Alasingha Perumal at Madras.
Before appearing on the world stage on 11th September, 1893, he set out as a wandering mendicant from Calcutta in 1890 and traversed almost whole of India. While living a mendicant’s life, he was distressed to see the ancient India in its present degraded state after 700 years of Muslim rule and another 200 years under colonial rule.  
In his sojourn he took a vow that he will not touch money and he will not ask for food; if it comes by chance then only he will partake it. It so happened that he had to travel mostly on foot and many a times he couldn’t get food for 2-3 days at a stretch. Many a times he fainted due to hunger. During his travels he lived with kings and rich people on the one hand and at the same time stayed with lowest of the low so he could see the real India. He was trying to find and feel the SOUL of India. The people who met him were enthralled and enchanted by his depth and breadth of knowledge and insight on the one hand and his purity, dispassion, childlike simplicity and sense of humor on the other.
It was in Madras that a group of young men seeing his vast knowledge and oratorical skills requested the Swami to represent Hinduism in the then forthcoming The World Parliament of Religions to be held in Chicago. They even collected money from common people to this effect. But the Swami only agreed to their proposal when he got the divine command from his Master Sri Ramakrishna Paramhansa and also from Ramakrishna’s divine consort Holy Mother Sarada Devi.
He reached Chicago a few weeks earlier than the Parliament of Religions. After reaching he learnt that the Parliament will happen only after a few weeks. He also came to know that no one would be admitted as a delegate without proper references and that in all the events the time for being admitted had gone by. This almost broke the Swami’s spirit. To have come all the way from India for nothing! He also realized that he had not brought any credentials to show that he had come to represent Hinduism. Moreover, he had very little money with which could hardly sustain him till the actual Parliament began. So, he shifted to comparatively cheaper Boston till the Parliament but he always felt sure in his heart that he had a divine command and that the lord will guide him. Before embarking for America he said to his brother disciple, Swami Turiyananda: “Haribhai, The Parliament of Religions is being organized for this (pointing to himself)). My mind tells me so. You will see it verified at no distant date.“ We certainly know that these were neither the egoistic effusion nor the chauvinistic pride of an ambitious man but the burning words of a Prophet.
In Boston he met Dr. John Henry Wright, a professor of Greek classics at Harvard University, who became instrumental in helping him fulfill the purpose for which he had come half way round the globe. The Swami had given up all hopes of speaking at the Parliament but Prof. Wright was so deeply impressed with him that he insisted that he represents Hinduism at the important gathering. The Swami explained his difficulties and said that he had no credentials whereupon Prof. Wright exclaimed, “to ask you, Swami, for credentials is like asking the Sun to state its right to shine!” The professor assured that he would take it upon himself to see that he had a place as a delegate. He wrote a letter of introduction to the Chairman of the selection Committee stating, “Here is a man who is more learned than all our learned professors put together.“ This was indeed God send! The Swami rejoiced at this indubitable manifestation of divine providence. The purpose for which he had come so far was to be fulfilled in a way that could not have been foreseen.
The Parliament of Religions, which was held in connection with the World's Columbian Exposition in the city of Chicago from September 11 to 27, 1893, was undoubtedly one of the great epoch-making events of the world, marking as it did an era in the history of religions, especially in that of Hinduism.  Charles Bonney, the mastermind of the Parliament, in his welcome address said, “We seek in this congress to unite all religions against irreligion.” Also he said, “if the great religious faiths could be brought (together), many points of sympathy and unity could be found and the common unity of mankind in the love of god or the service of man (would) be greatly facilitated and advanced.” It is another story that Reverend Barrows, Pastor of the first Presbyterian Church of Chicago, who was responsible for carrying out the preparations and many other leaders had other views. He said, “we believe that Christianity is to supplant all other religions, because it contains all the truth there is in them and much besides revealing and redeeming God.” One bishop wrote, “One result (of the Parliament) will be to show that the Christian faith was never more widely or more intelligently believed in, or Jesus Christ more adoringly followed.”
The opening session was inaugurated on September 11, 1893, at 10 am by sounding the bell ten times signifying the ten principal religions. The sessions were held in the large Hall of Columbus, with a capacity of 7000. The hall was filled to capacity on the opening day. It was presided over by Cardinal Gibbons, who sat in the center. Around him sat all the delegates including Vivekananda. Swami Vivekananda was on the podium along with scholarly and erudite representatives from all over the world. Numerous papers were read by the various delegates. He was a little intimidated, as he himself confessed, and kept passing up his chance to give his inaugural address. At last, however, in the last session of the day, he could refuse no more and rose up to give his address.
There were other speakers who spoke before him who were all duly applauded but when Swami Vivekananda rose to speak and started his address by uttering, ”Sisters and Brothers of America,” the effect was electrical; the whole audience stood up to a man, cheering and waiving wildly for minutes. It was an inspiration of sorts which were conveyed by the speaker - an actuality that touched their hearts and fused them all into a common humanity. It was as if the Parliament had been convened just for this supreme moment. It was Vivekananda’s communication of spirituality to the West. When the audience again settled down to hear him, it was the most ancient nation of India extending its hand of spiritual brotherhood to the new nation of America through a short speech of the Swami from whose lips every word fell like nectar saturated with intense feeling that went straight to the heart.
The Swami said that he belonged to the most ancient order of monks, and that he was proud of the tolerance, nay, universal acceptance taught by his religion, and practiced by his nation. He said:
I am proud to belong to a nation which has sheltered the persecuted and the refugees of all religions and all nations of the earth. I am proud to tell you that we have gathered in our bosom the purest remnant of the Israelites, who came to Southern India and took refuge with us in the very year in which their holy temple was shattered to pieces by Roman tyranny. I am proud to belong to the religion which has sheltered and is still fostering the remnant of the grand Zoroastrian nation. I will quote to you, brethren, a few lines from a hymn which I remember to have repeated from my earliest boyhood, which is every day repeated by millions of human beings: "As the different streams having their sources in different paths which men take through different tendencies, various though they appear, crooked or straight, all lead to Thee.”
“The present convention,” he continued, “is one of the most august assemblies ever held, is in itself a vindication, a declaration to the world of the wonderful doctrine preached in the Gita: ‘Whosoever comes to Me, through whatsoever form, I reach him; all men are struggling through paths which in the end lead to me.’ Sectarianism, bigotry, and its horrible descendant, fanaticism, have long possessed this beautiful earth. They have filled the earth with violence, drenched it often and often with human blood, destroyed civilization and sent whole nations to despair. Had it not been for these horrible demons, human society would be far more advanced than it is now. But their time is come; and I fervently hope that the bell that tolled this morning in honor of this convention may be the death-knell of all fanaticism, of all persecutions with the sword or with the pen, and of all uncharitable feelings between persons wending their way to the same goal.”
Each of the other orators had spoken of his God, of the God of his sect. Swami Vivekananda alone spoke of all their Gods, and embraced them all in the Universal Being. It was the message of eternal India taught by his Master Sri Ramakrishna breaking down the barriers through the mouth of this great personality. The Parliament of Religions gave the young orator an ovation.
It was palpable even to the dullest intellect that Vivekananda’s universalism was a felt reality, and that his call to brotherhood and plea for tolerance, cooperation and mutual respect were not sounded in the name of any one religion, but in the name of all religions. Quotation from scriptures and references to historical actualities proved that these were not ideal fancies but the reiteration of beliefs concretized in a whole nation‘s life.
Swamiji use to say that he had a message for the West as Buddha had one for the East. After his successful advent in the western horizon his ideas were discussed for or against among preachers. General people understood the importance and significance of prayers and promised to lead a better life. Swami Vivekananda had hailed America saying that “It was reserved for America to proclaim to all quarters of the globe that the Lord is in every religion.” Marie Louise Burke, in her monumental research work which has been published in six huge volumes as New Discoveries, opines that the advent of so great an Acharya as Swamiji seems to have agitated the spiritual forces latent in America. It had awakened among some Americans a hunger for spiritual sustenance and men and women spontaneously rushed to satisfy it. Swamiji had lit the fire of spirituality in innumerable hearts. The Church authorities realized the futility and foolishness of sending half educated theological students to instruct the wise Orientals.
Swamiji’s great speeches cannot be forgotten or bypassed with the passage of time. It is always resonating and continually influencing the world thinkers. We may mention by way of illustration the address given by Mr. Federico Mayor, Director General, UNESCO (1987 to 1999) on 8 October, 1993 at Paris wherein he mentioned being struck by the similarity between UNESCO‘s objectives and the thought given by Swami Vivekananda one hundred years ago.
The impact of his message on Indian people brought a breeze of amazement as the Swami’s unique achievement swept over the land; it created an outburst of joy and national pride. They provided stimulus enough to awaken the sleeping Leviathan that was India at that time. This instilled in the Indian mind a pride, not known for centuries. Swamiji’s vindication that India was the spiritual teacher of the world was a stimulating experience for heathen Indians.
The greatest service rendered by Swamiji was perhaps his service to Hinduism. Sister Nivedita writes in the introduction to Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda (first volume of total nine volumes) that “When he (The Swami) began to speak, it was the religious ideas of the Hindu; but when he ended, Hinduism had been created.” None before him could present such a comprehensive view of the vast mass of the religious ideas that passed for Hinduism. Besides, the presentation of Hinduism as embracing all the forms, from the lowest to the highest, added a new significance in the religious history of India. These raised Hinduism not only in the estimation of the West but in its own estimation as well. It contributed eventually to bring about cohesion and intrinsic strength in India’s national life. The import of his world mission can be summed up as follows:
i) Swamiji reminded the Parliament that holiness, purity, charity and such other virtues could be found in all climes and in all periods of history. Every religion has produced men of exalted character. These indicated that there is truth in every religion. Presenting this historical fact, the Swami bluntly told the religious leaders that triumph of any one religion and destruction of others was an impossible hope. He called upon the religious leaders to accept religious pluralism, recognizing the principle of unity in diversity and shun the concept of uniformity. To help society to keep itself from sectarianism, bigotry, and fanaticism, it demanded the practitioner of diverse faiths not only toleration but accepting other faiths as true.
ii) Swamiji proclaimed that man was potentially divine contrary to the Christian belief that man was a born sinner, the Veda declared men as “children of immortal bliss.” However different a man may be from another with regard to the body, complexion, race, language, belief etc., every man is but a spark of the divine, if not divinity itself. There is animality as well as divinity present in man and the divinity is always struggling to win over its animality so that it can fully manifest his divinity. Every religion is committed to help man achieve this but unfortunately man has made very little use of religion for this purpose. Therefore, Swamiji’s main emphasis is on “Man-making religion” which pins its faith on the spiritual nature of man.
iii) Man looks lost in spite of the striking achievements of science and technology which have brought unthinkable comfort and conveni-ences. He finds himself divided into so many races, linguistic groups, religions, etc. He fails to reckon the spiritual substratum of all things and beings is a fact. Despite doctrines and dogmas, spiritual unity of mankind cannot be denied. Recognising this truth men and women all over the world should learn to keep the interests of individuals and nations in conformity with the interests of humankind at large.
A new world order based on harmony of religions and effective unity of mankind is what we all want today so that all can live in peace, happiness and fulfillment, and Swami Vivekananda did more than the “ground clearing job”. The noble ideas and inspirations his gospel provided are working imperceptibly but steadily even now we can see:
a) It has given rise to inter faith movements which is gaining momentum. Earlier they were confined to inter-religious dialogues but now for better understanding among people of diverse faiths they are participating in such dialogues. The study of comparative religions has become practice-oriented to improve the “quality of life.”
b) Even the dogmatic Catholic Church in their second ecumenical Council in 1970 declared with a little reservation that it rejects nothing which is true and holy in other religions.
c)  Swamiji’s participation in the Parliament opened the door to eastern religious traditions, including Vedanta. In the last few decades, a large number of religious groups from South East Asia, particularly India, have invaded the West culturally.
One hundred and twenty five years may be enough for evaluating an event in retrospect, but not sufficient for appraisal of as great a historic event as the Parliament of Religions that was held in 1893 in Chicago that had created quite a stir. It brought among the liberals the vision of a new world, a world of harmony and peace. But many parliaments of Religions were held after this Chicago Parliament; even to commemorate its centenary in 1993 a similar parliament was held in that very place. In 1893, only16 religious group participated where as in 1993 as many as 125 religious groups addressed 6000 delegates from all over the world. But it turned out to be insignificant compared to the first parliament held in 1893. The 1893 Parliament was a defining moment in world history.
It is unfortunate that terrorists selected this very date in 2001 for the biggest terror attack in the U.S.A. There is one 9/11, 1893 when Vivekananda appealed to the people against “Sectarianism, bigotry, and its horrible descendant, fanaticism” and it was on the very same date in 2001 that few fanatics did just the opposite of what Swamiji said. In modern times 9/11, 2001 is more remembered for this terror attack rather than Swamiji’s appearance like a meteor in the sky and it quickly vanished from the awareness of the people in general.
Never before was Swamiji’s gospel more relevant than it is today. Ignoring Swami Vivekananda’s fervent appeal at the Parliament, most of the religious communities have continued to nurture the deep-seated sectarianism, bigotry, fanaticism and fundamentalism. Evils like racism and inter-ethnic and religious conflict are reappearing among us with renewed force. But the flame Swami Vivekananda ignited has not died down. The famous historian Arnold Toynbee has concluded at the end of his 12 volume monumental research entitled A Study of History  that “It is already becoming clear that a chapter which had a Western beginning will have to have an Indian ending if it is not to end in self-destruction of the human race. At this supremely dangerous moment in human history, the only way of salvation is the ancient Hindu way. Here we have the attitude and spirit that can make it possible for the human race to grow together into a single family.”
Swami Vivekananda’s historic address before the Parliament will continue to be our guide as well as source of perennial inspiration. He  will continue to be our pole star in  the ages to come.
·        Swami Sujayananda is a Senior Monk at Ramakrishna Mission Ashrama, Gwalior, M.P.

              Published in Re-Markings Vol 18 No.1 March 2019 www.re-markings.com

Swami Sujayananda with Nibir K. Ghosh at the launch of Bose: Immortal Legend of India's Freedom at Agra on 18 March 2017.

Copyright Nibir K. Ghosh 2019.





Thursday, 25 April 2019

Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam: Memories Revisited by Debasish Chakraborti Published in Re-Markings, March 2019 - www.re-markings.com


                                      Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam: Memories Revisited
Debasish Chakraborti


My eventful journey in DRDO since 1985 landed me to a premier laboratory named ADRDE, Agra as Director. Among other things, I was happy to meet two erudite scholars of Agra College, Agra, Dr. Nibir K. Ghosh and Dr. Sunita. It is Nibirda who has motivated me to write about the illustrious personality of Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam with whatever experience I gathered as a scientist. I humbly offer the following reminiscences as a tribute to one of the most worthy sons of Mother India.
It happened to be a rainy morning at Chandigarh DRDO guest house, when I saw our chief of DRDO, Dr. Kalam taking a stroll in the midst of deep clouds, quite relaxed with rain water gently sprinkling his head. About 2/3 weeks ago, the country had witnessed “Pokhran-II” — the nuclear experiment at Rajasthan under the able stewardship of Kalam sir. I quickly got down and congratulated him on the success of Pokhran. On the same afternoon at the lunch table along with young scientists from DRDO, Dr. Kalam put up two specific questions to the youngsters. One was, “Why has India always been the target country for all invaders including a small country like Portugal?” and the second one, “Why India always, almost all the times, has given in to the invaders?” The questions were simple but intellectually loaded and it still hovers on me to find the most appropriate reasons and answers to both the questions in this jigsaw puzzle of information blast in the world. However, one thing was certain that he had kindled the quest to know our country and serve it with all righteousness.
I asked him on the same day, whether this nuclear test was indeed a priority for the country which has been facing all kinds of problems like poverty, malnutrition, health, education and Roti-Kapda-Makan. “Good Question” was his impromptu response in his usual way … but his answer to the question startled me a lot. He said: “The U.S.A. administration has rolled the heads, since they could not anticipate/predict this great event and at the same time in the American media, probably for the first time, they talked about ‘nuclear fission experiment in India’ several times, which is a homegrown technology.” He reiterated, “technology is strength, and strength respects strength.” This is how this great man, whom I knew for quite a long time in relation to Defence R&D works, remained embedded in my mind, as a leader and facilitator for harnessing indigenous technologies for self- reliance of the nation.
We had been working in the field of antiship and antisubmarine torpedoes in the DRDO Laboratory, NSTL, Visakhapatnam for quite long. I still remember the day, when DRDO chief Dr. Kalam sanctioned the torpedo project a very paltry sum of Rs. 30 crores with 5 years duration when the country did not possess the infrastructure of underwater acoustic ranges — which all other torpedo developing nations used to have, specifically U.S.A., that had invested almost about Rs 1000 crore for the Range. Our scientists worked day and night on developing the technology of light weight and heavy weight torpedoes. As expected, lot of technological challenges were faced by us and we started exploring the gap between theory and practice at field trials at sea, where torpedoes used to sink to the bottom of the sea with no data of failure available to the scientists (since the recorded data also used to be lost in case of torpedo sinking). These setbacks were found to be expensive as well as demotivating for the Scientists. Kalam sir once constituted a committee with veteran scientists of DRDO who had tasted success in their respective fields in Missile programs (namely Dr. V.K. Saraswat, Dr. Prahlada, Dr. S.K. Ray, Admiral Mohan Rao and others) to review and analyse the various problems in torpedo failures at the Laboratory. Exhaustive reviews were conducted in detail and the scientists learnt a lot and made a comprehensive way ahead plans for the project. The torpedo project was getting delayed and the Navy was getting restless to have the weapon on board. Admiral S. Mahapatra from Navy was posted to the Lab and he was instructed to Push the project. Admiral Mohapatra took charge of the laboratory and started giving a momentum to the project with all his leadership skills.
One morning at sea, Dr. Kalam came on board INS Saryu to witness the field trial. Unfortunately, the weather was not congenial for recovery of torpedo and the trial was cancelled by Navy. Dr. Kalam asked me to describe the events starting from the launch tube through the pre-setting till recovery after the underwater run as per the mission requirement. We explained him all the events in detail. I explained to him that water ingress inside the torpedo will make it sink and it is not only the expensive torpedo we lose, we lose the mission run data also, since the black box recording the data comes up to the surface along with the torpedo. Unlike missiles, the underwater acoustic communication cannot be captured above using telemetry. I referred to one important trial at sea after implementing some improvements in the design based on his review. The torpedo was supposed to be surfacing after 8 minutes of run underwater but the weapon was not sighted by the helicopter. I had no control on torpedo and therefore submitted to God and started writing “Om Sri Saraswatyai namo” in the ship’s wardroom several times when suddenly the ship announcement came up: “torpedo sighted and being recovered” — what a joy for us at that moment! After listening to this story,  Dr. Kalam quipped, “How many times have you written that shloka before it was recovered?” I said it was 44 times, but not 9,11,13 etc. as normally the rituals go in pujas. Sir said, “I understand your agony and anxiety…but immediately thereafter with a pause, he pulled me up with humour … “Why not you make a suitable program with that shloka 44 times and get it embedded to torpedo onboard computer OBC so that such failure will never happen?” We laughed with him and realised that he happens to be one of us and he generates the light moments and  the required frequency to resonate with scientists of all ranks. However, with great motivation, subsequently thereafter we progressed on the project well and we are proud to have inducted an indigenous  light weight torpedo (TAL) and one heavy weight torpedo (Varunastra)  into Indian Navy as on date. Dr. Kalam was a great leader and motivator to all the scientists for such mission of harnessing indigenous technologies for the security of the nation. 
Once, Dr. Kalam came for a visit to the laboratory for a review of projects and we displayed the critical technology hardware as exhibits. Our Director was explaining the things and we were standing there for any clarifications. At one point in one of the exhibits of high energy density battery, he told our Director, “Admiral, let us listen from this young scientist, let him explain, let us see how he does it, is that ok?“ Admiral said … “yes sir.” He always used to inspire and motivate the young scientists in his own usual way. He used to ask them, ”what do you feel, what are the scope for improvement, have we benchmarked it with the global state of art technologies? Where are the gaps?” Whenever he used to come for visit to the laboratory, program itinerary would be sent to him … and invariably he made changes. Suppose we said the program would start at 0900 hrs … he would change it and say that he intended to have discussion with all young scientists and technical officers at 0630 hrs and the agenda would be spelt out by him at that time. He would have discussions on Decoys — the countermeasure for torpedoes … he asked us, what we were thinking about our torpedoes to be intelligent enough not to get decoyed by our adversaries. How the scientists were thinking of making the torpedo stealthier … or how to increase the speed of the torpedo … can we achieve missile speed underwater? etc etc. We used to reflect on all these points in the lab and thus make value addition to the product to the extent feasible. Quite often, he used to say “think out of the box, dream big but at the same time please wake up and toil to realise it.”
On one occasion our Director wanted him to address all officers and staff of NSTL in a very short time available to him at Vizag. In the same address, he said “what you want me to say to your officers? You are all good guys ... keep working etc etc?” For a change, he said “I would rather request you to introspect and ask yourselves, what all important things you guys are not doing, what all you need to work and improve. Please make a way ahead document project-wise with timelines. I will look into it when I come next to the laboratory.” — This was his way to synergise the scientific community. A very simple way to pass the message to scientists to shun complacency.
Dr. Kalam worked tirelessly for achieving self-reliance in the field of Defence research and development, boosted DRDO in the IGMDP (Integrated and guided missile development program) and became the Missile Man of India. Simple living and high thinking coupled with the urge of serving the nation has always been his forte.
The time passed by and Dr. Kalam was elevated to the level of Chief scientific advisor to the Prime Minister.
One morning, 25th July 2002, the dawn saw him rise as the first citizen of India — the Rashtrapati — the President of India. We were indeed excited to witness the recognition bestowed on him by the nation. An honest individual, a simple and kind soul, a visionary, an  eternal learner and a Teacher with scientific background took the oath to serve the nation. The story beyond is all well known to the countrymen. His emotional and iconic connectivity with the youth and children of India is widely known and appreciated. We were proud to see that our leader and mentor had become the leader of the nation. Subsequently He was conferred the country’s highest award, Bharat Ratna in the year 2013. 
We met him last as President when he came to Visakhapatnam and visited our laboratory NSTL, saw our progress of works and then  addressed all the school children of Vizag at Manasi Auditorium as President. The representative children from all the schools of Vizag gathered in the auditorium along with their teachers. The President of India stepped on to the dais with a thunderous applause and claps from all the students, which kept on resounding in the auditorium for a long time. He too joined the children in clapping till it sopped little later to a dead silence. He needed no introduction — by this time, Dr. Kalam had got introduced to all the children and youth of the country by his arduous interaction with them in social media.
Breaking the silence, he asked the children ... “how many of you have seen bumble bee in the natural parks?” So many children responded and explained how the bumble bee looks like, spherical in shape and wings to fly etc. However, one child retorted ... he had not been to any natural parks, so he did not see a bumble bee. The Pesident asked … “who is your class teacher?“  The class teacher got up. Kalam sir said to the teacher, “Please take the children to some natural surroundings at least twice a year, ok? This is Presidential order ok?“ Then he continued, “if you take this bumble bee shape to any aerodynamicist … he would say, this cannot fly … No? it does not have the aerodynamic shape…. So my dear children … how does it fly?”— all the children one after the other was trying to give some explanation in their own way … He said. “see, all of you are trying to see the reason, you all are flying … so, what is the bottom line? The bottom line is that the bumble bee wishes to fly … If you all wish to fly in your respective fields, if you want to take our nation ahead with innovative science and technologies …. YOU ALL WILL FLY and our nation will be proud of you.”
What an inspiring message! A thundering applause again—all of us present there discovered an honest man, a visionary, a thinker, a patriot—a humble soul with huge eternal power—the real hero—The Leader of the nation, the Bharat Ratna—Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam who has made us proud to be a citizen of this great nation. 
·        Debasish Chakraborti is an Outstanding Scientist (Scientist H) who has to his credit one Indian and one Russian patent granted on Floating Recorder and Transmitter. With a Masters degree in Mechanical Engineering from Cranfield Institute of Technology, U.K., he began his eventful career with Indian Oxygen Limited, Kolkata before moving on to DRDO at the Naval Science and Technological Laboratory NSTL, Visakhapatnam in 1985. At the DRDO he has worked on several prestigious assignments before joining as Director, Aerial Delivery Research & Development Establishment (ADRDE), Agra. He is a distinguished Fellow of Indian Institute of Engineers. His special contributions relate to Paratrooper parachute systems, Brake and seat ejection Parachute systems for all fighter aircrafts, including LCA for Indian Army and Airforce, Aerostat Surveillance systems and Tactical Aerostat. He has also worked on Airship development and Parachute System for Human Space Program of ISRO. 
v

Published in Re-Markings Vol 18 No.1 March 2019
Copyright Nibir K Ghosh 2019
www.re-markings.com



                                                              Debasish Chakraborti & Dr. Paromita