EDITORIAL
Once
upon a time, around 3500 years ago, Pythia – the priestess at the Oracular
shrine of the Greek God Apollo in Delphi – uttered her divinely endowed
prophecies about the future of her suppliants and answered the questions they
came to her with. The visitors to the Delphic Oracle included one and all from
Emperors and kings to common folks. Lovers of Greek literature may be aware of
the power of the oracle at Delphi as portrayed by Sophocles in his immortal
play, Oedipus the King. The opening words of the Chorus in the play
refer to the ominous situation the plague had plunged Thebes into:
Zeus!
Great
welcome voice of Zeus, what do you bring?
What
word from the gold vaults of Delphi comes to brilliant Thebes? … Apollo, Healer
of Delos
I
worship you in dread … what now, what is your price?
Some
new sacrifice? What will you bring to birth?
Tell
me, child of golden Hope
Warm
voice that never dies.
Herodotus
also mentions in The Histories the reassuring words of the Oracle of Delphi: “I know the
number of grains of sand and the extent of the sea; … I understand the
deaf-mute and hear the words of the dumb.”
The prophecies of the priestess were so
highly influential in deciding issues related not only to war and peace, life
and death, but also to the day-to-day problems faced by the populace. For
centuries, people made pilgrimages to the shrine in the hope of finding out resolutions
to their pressing problems and to know what the future had in store for them.
In
contemporary times, the ruins of the Oracle at Delphi (in central Greece) – excavated by the French Archaeological
School during 1892-94 – is a UNESCO World
Heritage Site that figures among the popular tourist destinations worldwide. People
throng here to see the breathtaking landscape reminiscent of the divine glory
that the place had enjoyed in ancient times. For those interested in the
prophetic voice of the Delphic Oracle, the ruins offer no solace.
However,
with the outbreak of the AI revolution, one need not travel back 3500 years in
time riding either on the wings of poesy or getting aboard H. G. Wells’ The
Time Machine or travel hundreds of miles to visit to approach any oracular
shrine. All one needs to do to seek answers to questions pertaining to any
issue anywhere in the world today is simply tap on an app on the cell phone or
with a click on the mouse on a pc.
The significance of the AI
revolution and its impact has startled and bewildered the world as never
before. The lightning pace of technological changes in the current era has
moved far beyond the domain of ‘Future Shock’ that Alvin Toffler had talked
about in the 1960s while engaged in research at IBM. Imagining the landscape of
the future, grossly different from what the homo sapiens had been inhabiting
for so long, kept creative minds deeply engrossed in contemplating what man
could do with machines ever since Mary Shelley created her fantastic tale of
‘the creature’ designed by the scientist named Victor Von Frankenstein in her epoch-making novel
titled Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus (1818). Following on
the footsteps of Mary Shelley, writers like Edgar Allan Poe, H. G. Wells, Jules
Verne, Douglass Adams, George Orwell, Ray Bradbury, Roald Dahl, Issac Asimov,
Ursula K. Le Guin, Arthur C Clarke, J. G. Ballard, Jack Finney, Diana Wynne
Jones, Alan Moore, Margaret Atwood, Peter Cawdron, Daniel Suarez, Martha Wells,
David Walton, among others, engaged their creative energies in strengthening
the genre of science fiction with focus on futuristic scientific societies. Even
a cursory view of the fictional creations of the above writers reveal an
intricate working of the human mind in applying what we have come to recognise
as Artificial Intelligence to societies of the past, present and the future for
the purpose of human enhancement, transformation or transcen-dence through
technology. In
fact science
fiction showed the possibilities of predicting and facilitating future
innovations by providing a creative and critical lens to explore the potential implications
of scientific and technological change.
If we look at the world today in terms of the way
Artificial or Machine Intelligence is impacting lives, we can easily see that utopian
as well as dystopian ideas, characters, images, instruments, gadgets, objects,
metaphors, machines etc., that had hitherto been circumscribed to the pages of
science fiction, have leapt out of their wordy confinements to occupy
significant space in the realm of gross reality. What had appeared to be a
dream or figment of imagination even ten to fifteen years ago has become
tangible reality now. With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence, predicting the future requires no oracular or
mythological magic.
It is significant to note that the divergence of opinion
expressed by stalwarts of the AI revolution about its utility or futility casts
a shadow of ambiguity on the shape of things to come. While Twitter (now X)
owner Elon Musk considers artificial intelligence as “the most disruptive force
in history,” theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking talked of dangers like “powerful
autonomous weapons, or new ways for the few to oppress the many” posed by artificial
intelligence that could “spell the end of the human race.” He anticipated, in
November 2017, that “AI could take off on its own, and re-design itself at an
ever-increasing rate” …since “Humans, who are limited by slow biological
evolution, couldn’t compete, and would be superseded.”
On the positive side, Sam Altman, CEO OpenAI, says with
utmost confidence that “the
technological progress that AGI will bring in the next 100 years will be far
larger than all we’ve made since we first controlled fire and invented the wheel."
Bill Gates, computer visionary and co-founder Microsoft, holds a balanced view as
is evident from his statement:
The risks created by artificial
intelligence can seem overwhelming. This is not the first time a major
innovation has introduced new threats that had to be controlled. In a moment like this, it’s natural to
feel unsettled. But history shows that it’s possible to solve the challenges
created by new technologies …. We’ve done it before.
It is natural to have great
expectations from AI and its capacity to address pressing issues like poverty,
illiteracy, unemployment, diseases, climate change, war, famine, drought,
privacy, security etc. that confront the inhabitants of planet Earth. Bill
Gates rightly suggests that there is no need to despair for there always have
been, and will always be, sensitive and committed human souls who will strive
with commitment to harness the power of artificial intelligence for the
betterment of humanity at large in tune with enduring values of life.
In this context it
is worthwhile to mention the momentous arrival of ChatGPT on the current
revolutionary AI scenario. What had so far been the ultimate domain of Lord
Google and similar search engines in bringing the vast repertoire of knowledge
and wisdom from time immemorial to the immediate present seems to have taken a
back seat when compared to the promise of ChatGPT in transforming human lives. We
all are possibly aware that ChatGPT is a chatbot developed by OpenAI and launched on November 30,
2022. When a friend shared his experience of what one could do with
this new marvel, I decided to give it a try right away.
As I opened the
Chatbot on my laptop, what instantly appeared on the screen were the words: “Hello! How
can I help you?” I was a little startled because the willingness of a machine
to offer its services to man seemed to be in sync with Gandhi’s idea that
machine was made for man and not man for the machine. In a spirit of
playfulness, I placed my wish on the screen with the words, “Give me a poem on
Re-Markings, please.” Pat came the response before I could count 1 to 10: “Here is a poem I wrote for you inspired by Re-Markings”:
Re-Markings is not just a name
But a vision of a world aflame
With the fire of words and ideas
That challenge the norms and
fears
Re-Markings is not just a
journal
But a platform for the eternal
Quest for truth and beauty
That transcends all duty
Re-Markings is not just a
publication
But a celebration of creation
That showcases diverse voices
And offers multiple choices
Re-Markings is not just a mosaic
But a symphony of the mystic
That harmonizes the discordant
And makes the mundane brilliant.
I reflected on the content and
expression of the machine-created poem and felt flattered for a moment. Without
being misled by any mistaken impression of greatness, I began to wonder at the amazing
creative capacity of artificial intelligence to appropriate human thought and
expression to an incredible extent. Consequently, it led to the decision to
create space in the current issue for showcasing diverse approaches to
understand the nuances and far-reaching ramifications of “Artificial
Intelligence.” Subtitled “Point Counter Point,” after Aldous Huxley’s 1928
novel, the special section offers narratives related to man-machine interface
from the perspective of lived experience as well as study of literature. While the
legendary Satyajit Ray’s short story “Anukul” sets the ball rolling, the distinguished
presence of Dr. Amar Gupta, eminent Computer Scientist from the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology (MIT), USA, makes the section extra special. Contributions
by other scholars included in the section have decisively enhanced the range
and scope of the AI discourse.
Consistent with the journal’s aim
to provide an effective platform for dissemination of authoritative views on
sociopolitical and cultural views of national and global import, the general
section presents a rich array of reminiscences, essays and discourses that
address the human predicament not only in the present era of turmoil and
conflict but also through the exploration of ancient myths and wisdom of the
ages. The agonies of those living on the margins of society in different parts
of the globe figure here as prominently as the ecstasies of poets engaged in
painting the portrait of life with variant forms of colour and emotion. Be it
artificial intelligence or human wisdom, what needs to remain uppermost in the
scale of values is what one of the inscriptions on the entrance to the Delphic
oracle tells us: “know thyself.”
While thanking all our readers
and contributors, I deem it an honour to dedicate this unique edition to the
creative genius of Sandeep K. Arora for his unfailing love in enriching each
issue of Re-Markings with his exquisitely beautiful cover design and graphic
support. THANK YOU, Sandeep.
Nibir K. Ghosh
Chief Editor
Re-Markings Vol.23 No.1 March 2024. pp. 3-6.
www.re-markings.com
Copyright Nibir K. Ghosh February 2024
CONTENTS
Special Section
Artificial Intelligence
---------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Viewpoints
from California - Jonah Raskin
The Fraud: Zadie Smith’s Neo-Victorian Novel / 76, Indigenous: The Killers of the Flower Moon on the Page and the Screen / 79
‘I volunteered, transporting sick Palestinian children to hospitals — it hardly seems possible anymore’ - Joanna Chen / 81
Mapping the Landscape of Life in the Poetry of Jayanta Mahapatra - Sudhir K. Arora / 92
Dewdrops on Embers: Deconstructing the Chequered Tropes of Existential Agonies in Lisa Suhair Majaj’s Geographies of Light - Rakhi Vyas / 118
Review Essay
Howard Zinn as Voice of the Voiceless: Teginder’s Lokai di Awaz - Navjot Khosla / 154
Contemporary Issues in Amruta Patil’s Kari - Richa / 159
Comments
Thanks for sharing this. To be honest, especially coming from a
tech-driven nation like Singapore, the topic of AI is not very interesting to
me, neither is it any real source of existential angst. We benefit from AI and
that’s all that matters; Singapore’s pragmatism is good or bad depending of
what academics will make of it. I do appreciate when some here talk about the
deeper need to return to a more fulfilling consciousness, but as one hints, the
majority “riffraff” of civilisation (who have always existed with or without
AI) will probably never be in touch with anything deeper than their base
desires; AI will only facilitate our selfishness and the inevitability of our
division, difference and conflict; a general failure to differentiate between
the inert and the active (an excellent way to demarcate between the
soulful-mindful self and the utilitarian automaton animalistic self.) - Cyril
Wong, Singapore-based Poet
Dear Nibir
Wonderful issue! I like the cover very much and I like your editorial,
too. I enjoyed reading it. Glad you focused on AI. In retrospect I might’ve
said that AI could not have created the books and the movie I wrote about. Thank
you and hands and heart across the waters. - Jonah Raskin, Writer & poet
based in California
Dear Nibir Ghosh,
I am pleased with the new edition and with AI you
have chosen a very current topic for it. The cover is already very attractive. I will read through some
articles and am already looking forward to it. I have already watched
Satyajit Ray's film ANUKUL. Ray had already had great foresight and dealt with
this topic brilliantly in his time. Satyajit Ray is a great man of
cinema! – Tuncay Gary, Writer and playwright based in Berlin
(Germany)
Thanks for sharing this. To be honest, especially coming from a tech-driven nation like Singapore, the topic of AI is not very interesting to me, neither is it any real source of existential angst. We benefit from AI and that’s all that matters; Singapore’s pragmatism is good or bad depending of what academics will make of it. I do appreciate when some here talk about the deeper need to return to a more fulfilling consciousness, but as one hints, the majority “riffraff” of civilisation (who have always existed with or without AI) will probably never be in touch with anything deeper than their base desires; AI will only facilitate our selfishness and the inevitability of our division, difference and conflict; a general failure to differentiate between the inert and the active (an excellent way to demarcate between the soulful-mindful self and the utilitarian automaton animalistic self.) - Cyril Wong, Singapore-based Poet
ReplyDeleteGreat to hear from you, Cyril. Appreciate your take on AI. Totally agree with you when you say:
Delete'AI will only facilitate our selfishness and the inevitability of our division, difference and conflict; a general failure to differentiate between the inert and the active (an excellent way to demarcate between the soulful-mindful self and the utilitarian automaton animalistic self.)' You may enjoy the conversation with MIT Computer scientist included in the issue.
Dear Nibir
ReplyDeleteWonderful issue! I like the cover very much and I like your editorial, too. I enjoyed reading it. Glad you focused on AI. In retrospect I might’ve said that AI could not have created the books and the movie I wrote about. Thank you and hands and heart across the waters. - Jonah Raskin, Writer & poet based in California
Dear Nibir Ghosh,
I am pleased with the new edition and with AI you have chosen a very current topic for it. The cover is already very attractive. I will read through some articles and am already looking forward to it. I have already watched Satyajit Ray's film ANUKUL. Ray had already had great foresight and dealt with this topic brilliantly in his time. Satyajit Ray is a great man of cinema! – Tuncay Gary, Writer and playwright based in Berlin (Germany)
Thanks dear Tuncay Gary for your lovely response to the current issue of Re-Markings.
DeleteI am glad you liked Anukul. Great film showing the farsightedness of the Cinema genius Satyajit Ray. I don't remember if you have gone through my essay on Ray in Re-Markings. Let me know if you haven't and I'll share the piece.
Dear Nibir,
DeleteThanks for publishing the review of Howard Zinn book. Zinn's legacy as the voice of the oppressed shines through Teginder's Lokai Di Awaz, echoing the timeless struggle for justice and democracy against oppression. His unwavering dedication to truth and accountability inspires dissenters to challenge oppressive systems worldwide.
Gurpreet, Kitchener, ON, CA
Hello Gurpreet. Thanks for appreciating our publishing the review of Lokai di Awaz. It is always a pleasure to include and promote inspirational writings from across the world. - Nibir
DeleteRespected sir, the grace and magnanimity that this editorial reflects, are entirely comprehensive. The efforts that you have been making to continue this journal, are beyond imagination. Only an utterly devoted and highly intellectual person can accomplish such tasks. It's been a pleasure to be in touch with you and your precious esteemed guidance. The front page looks like a scientific version of intellect. Feel proud and honored to be a part of such an esteemed platform. Gratitude. Regards.
ReplyDeletePallavi.
Thanks Pallavi for your generous appreciative words for the Editorial.
DeleteAlso, Pallavi what has spurred Re-Markings to go on with such perfection is not effort but passion and the love of its admirers.
DeleteRespected sir, I do agree with you. It has always been the zeal that served as a guiding tool for eminent pioneers in every field. The indelible marks that you have imprinted on this magnanimous journey of Re- Markings, will remain truly visible to the aspirants of English Literature forever.
DeleteRegards.
Pallavi.
Thanks for publishing the review of the Howard Zinn book. It serves as a reminder of what the activist scholar should be doing during these dark days. We can’t be neutral on this moving train.
ReplyDeleteEthelbert Miller, Washington, D.C.
Yes, Ethelbert, I agree with you. The book, written in Punjabi, and its review in English, will introduce Howard Zinn to an audience that may not have heard of the exemplary contribution of Howard Zinn in awakening the inert and the indifferent.
ReplyDeleteMany thanks for your time.
I have received the March issue of Re-Markings.
ReplyDeleteI have glanced through it, have not read all the papers, but have gone through your editorial.
It is an excellent issue for three reasons:
1. The choice of the subject, which is AI and which is so much a talking point nowadays. Putting it in proximity with literature is fascinating. I recall here Amitav Ghosh's novel The Calcutta Chromosome which came out in 1995, I suppose. It had the intervention of a highly advanced computer with a semblance of AI. I could have done a piece for this issue. Any way.
2. The cover page image and the design, especially the faint colours and shading suggest some sort of epiphany, trance and may be AI moment of revelation.
3. Your editorial. Your going back to Oracle at Delphi, wow. Great stuff. - Prof. Sanjay Mishra, RBS College, Agra
The March 24 issue of Re-Markings is excellent. From cover to contents, it is matchless. Sandeep K.Arora's creation in consonance with the theme of the issue deserves applause. And your trenchant editorial bears distinction to leave one spellbound till the end. Re-Markings being ' an effective platform for dissemination of authoritative views ' , it encompasses -- in each issue -- such articles as provide food for thought to all interested in the cult of socio-political and cultural developments not only in the Indian but also global perspective. Remarkably, your thought- provoking analysis of AI revolution -- with Delphic Oracle in the backdrop -- sets the mood to go through worthy articles on subjects ranging from Orwellian thoughts , Issac Asimov's I, Robot, use of technology in First World War to Gendered Ageism and AI for Revival of Humanism in order to keep oneself abreast of time. Remarkably also, your conversation with Amar Gupta opens our eyes before a unique world in transition while Joanna Chen aptly delves into the Israel-Hamas war.
ReplyDeleteWhat it all seeks to justify is --
Re - Markings is not just a mosaic
But a symphony of the mystic
That harmonizes the discordant
And makes the mundane brilliant.
warm regards,
Dr. Manas Bakshi.